Leverage points for sustainability transformation

| July 15, 2016 | Leave a Comment

Item Link: Access the Resource

Date of Publication: June 25, 2016

Year of Publication: 2016

Publisher: The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Springer

Author(s): David J. Abson, Joern Fischer, Julia Leventon, Jens Newig, Thomas Schomerus, Ulli Vilsmaier, Henrik von Wehrden, Paivi Abernethy, Christopher D. Ives, Nicolas W. Jager, Daniel J. Lang

Journal: Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment

Volume: 45:4

Is sustainability science engaging with the root causes of unsustainability? Are there areas of intervention we are overlooking that could prove far more transformational? The research team Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformations at Leuphana University Lueneburg lays out the conceptual framework and research agenda they will be using to explore these questions.

ABSTRACT: Despite substantial focus on sustainability issues in both science and politics, humanity remains on largely unsustainable development trajectories. Partly, this is due to the failure of sustainability science to engage with the root causes of unsustainability. Drawing on ideas by Donella Meadows, we argue that many sustainability interventions target highly tangible, but essentially weak, leverage points (i.e. using interventions that are easy, but have limited potential for transformational change). Thus, there is an urgent need to focus on less obvious but potentially far more powerful areas of intervention. We propose a research agenda inspired by systems thinking that focuses on transformational ‘sustainability interventions’, centred on three realms of leverage: reconnecting people to nature, restructuring institutions and rethinking how knowledge is created and used in pursuit of sustainability. The notion of leverage points has the potential to act as a boundary object for genuinely transformational sustainability science.

The views and opinions expressed through the MAHB Website are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the MAHB. The MAHB aims to share a range of perspectives and welcomes the discussions that they prompt.