Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink

| April 9, 2015 | Leave a Comment

Item Link: Access the Resource

Date of Publication: March 18, 2015

Year of Publication: 2015

Publisher: Nature Publishing Group, Macmillan Publishers Limited

Author(s): R.J.W. Brienen, Et al.

Journal: Nature

Volume: 519

Pages: 344-348

Tree mortality rates in the Amazon are increasing and affecting the region’s capacity to store carbon. Whereas higher CO2 levels were found to stimulate extra growth in trees, the study from Brienen et al. indicates that the trees “lived faster, only to die sooner”.

ABSTRACT: Atmospheric carbon dioxide records indicate that the land surface has acted as a strong global carbon sink over recent decades1, 2, with a substantial fraction of this sink probably located in the tropics3, particularly in the Amazon4. Nevertheless, it is unclear how the terrestrial carbon sink will evolve as climate and atmospheric composition continue to change. Here we analyse the historical evolution of the biomass dynamics of the Amazon rainforest over three decades using a distributed network of 321 plots. While this analysis confirms that Amazon forests have acted as a long-term net biomass sink, we find a long-term decreasing trend of carbon accumulation. Rates of net increase in above-ground biomass declined by one-third during the past decade compared to the 1990s. This is a consequence of growth rate increases levelling off recently, while biomass mortality persistently increased throughout, leading to a shortening of carbon residence times. Potential drivers for the mortality increase include greater climate variability, and feedbacks of faster growth on mortality, resulting in shortened tree longevity5. The observed decline of the Amazon sink diverges markedly from the recent increase in terrestrial carbon uptake at the global scale1, 2, and is contrary to expectations based on models6.

Access the full article through the link above, and read Tim Radford’s summary for the Climate News Network here.

The views and opinions expressed through the MAHB Website are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the MAHB. The MAHB aims to share a range of perspectives and welcomes the discussions that they prompt.