Practices for facilitating interdisciplinary synthetic research: the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC)

| February 12, 2016 | Leave a Comment

Exchanging ideas

Item Link: Access the Resource

Date of Publication: January 2016

Year of Publication: 2016

Publisher: Elsevier

Author(s): Margaret A Palmer , Jonathan G Kramer, James Boyd, David Hawthorne

Journal: Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability

Volume: 19

Pages: 111-122

The emerging field of socio-environmental research calls for working across disciplines, but how can interdisciplinary SE research be successful? How can groups capitalize on the different languages, methods, perspectives, and types of data their members bring as opposed to them being obstacles? In this article, groups supported by the National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center (SESYNC) are evaluated to identify obstacles and best practices.

ABSTRACT: This paper describes the programs and processes of a new center designed to enhance interdisciplinary team effectiveness and the building of new communities of social and natural scientists undertaking socio-environmental synthesis research. The theory and organizational structure of the center is motivated by research on interdisciplinary team science from diverse social science fields. A set of core practices was developed to catalyze the formation of new teams, facilitate team development of shared conceptual frameworks and provide customized support for teams that have challenging methodological, computational, or group dynamic issues. The vast majority of the 58 teams thus far have self-reported good progress and positive team experiences and have published extensively. Most teams took advantage of one or more forms of customized support: 21% of the teams used facilitation services, 38% support for meeting design or for resolving problems that hindered team progress, and 46% of teams used advanced computational support. Throughout, we describe the most common problems teams encountered and provide perspectives on factors and practices that may best promote positive interdisciplinary outcomes on synthesis research by teams of social and natural scientists.

The views and opinions expressed through the MAHB Website are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the MAHB. The MAHB aims to share a range of perspectives and welcomes the discussions that they prompt.