Climate mitigation policy as a system solution: addressing the risk cost of carbon

| January 29, 2018 | Leave a Comment

Item Link: Access the Resource

File: Download

Media Type: Article - Recent

Date of Publication: May 4, 2017

Year of Publication: 2017

Publisher: Taylor & Francis Online

Author(s): Delton B Chen, Joel can der Beek, Jonathon Cloud

Journal: Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment

Volume: 7: 3

Pages: 233-274

Categories: , ,

How can climate finance could be most effectively mobilized in response to the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5–2°C? Authors Chen, van der Beek, and Cloud propose a new policy involving a “global reward for mitigation services, and a price signal based on risk assessments.”

ABSTRACT: Global 4C is a new international climate mitigation policy that adopts a risk management framework. Global 4C offers a financial reward for mitigation and aims to internalise a Risk Cost of Carbon (RCC) into the economy. Carbon taxes (i.e. carbon prices) are essential for internalising the Social Cost of Carbon (SCC), however a SCC-RCC duality is inferred with an epistemological method and is supported with a new hypothesis, called the Holistic Market Hypothesis. Based on the inferred SCC-RCC duality, a system of complementary market pricing is proposed as an effective response to emerging climate systemic risk and fat-tailed probability distributions for the Earth’s climate sensitivity. The recommended policy instrument is a currency, called Complementary Currencies for Climate Change (4C). 4C should be priced in foreign exchange currency markets (Forex) to mirror the RCC and to incentivise a spectrum of mitigation services, including clean renewable energy and carbon sequestration. A public broadcast message for climate systemic risk should be made each year, in the form of a ‘100-year advance 4C price alert’, which is an assurance of reward prices for carbon mitigation (i.e. the 4C exchange rate) under a Carbon Exchange Standard (CES). The CES is a macro-prudential protocol for central banks to provide collective insurability against climate catastrophe and incentives for socio-ecological co-benefits.

Read more.

The views and opinions expressed through the MAHB Website are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the MAHB. The MAHB aims to share a range of perspectives and welcomes the discussions that they prompt.