Economic de-growth vs. steady-state economy

| November 28, 2017 | Leave a Comment

Item Link: Read Article

Media Type: Article - Foundational

Date of Publication: November 10, 2009

Year of Publication: 2010

Publisher: Elsevier

Author(s): Christian Kerschner

Journal: Journal of Cleaner Production

Volume: 18

Pages: 544-551

Categories: , ,

In this review of the concepts of economic de-growth and a steady-state economy, Kerschner concludes that the concepts are in fact complements. Kerschner does note that economic de-growth and steady-state economics differ in their handling of the population issue. Whereas Herman Daly explicitly raises the role of population growth in economic growth and calls for limited birth licenses, statements on demography in the economic de-growth literature have thus far been “inconsistent and underdeveloped”. Kerschner argues that, “stabilisation or de-growth of the economy inevitably requires stabilisation or de-growth of the number of humans respectively,” and criticizes the “missing, patchy or incoherent,” treatment of the population problem by de-growth authors. (p546). Kerschner suggests that the bottom-up focus of the de-growth movement could lend a more acceptable and effective approach to the population problem than current top-down suggestions, like Daly’s limited birth licenses.

Email this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn
The views and opinions expressed through the MAHB Website are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the MAHB. The MAHB aims to share a range of perspectives and welcomes the discussions that they prompt.