Valuing the Resilience Dividend

| December 3, 2018 | Leave a Comment

River and Stuff by Ricardo Velasquez | Flickr | CC BY-ND 2.0

Item Link: Access the Resource

Media Type: Book - Recent

Year of Publication: 2017

Author(s): Judith Rodin

Categories: , ,

Just months after I became president of The Rockefeller Foundation, New Orleans experienced one of the worst disasters in American history: Hurricane Katrina.

While we did what we could to help address the human suffering in the immediate aftermath of the storm, The Rockefeller Foundation understood that the scale of this disaster was long in the making, due to a compendium of social, economic, and environmental challenges that had been simmering for decades, and because strategies that were designed to address crisis and natural shocks were narrow. In the rebuilding and recovery we saw an opportunity for the city to take a longer, more holistic view of the capacity of individuals, communities and systems to survive, adapt, and transform in the face of shocks and stresses. We wanted the city—and thousands of other communities—to develop that capacity to recover quickly and effectively when crises arise.

At the time, we didn’t call it resilience, but that’s what it was.

As the field of resilience has advanced during my tenure as the president of the University of Pennsylvania and in the twelve years I’ve led The Rockefeller Foundation, I’ve often spoken of the co-benefits that resilience planning and projects provide communities above and beyond the immediate mitigating solution—unrecognized benefits like social cohesion, job opportunities, environmental protections, and space for public use. My colleagues and I have shared that collaborative planning processes help unify communities by engaging diverse and widespread input, which builds social capital and supports cohesion. How smart urban planning can not only connect a fractured community, but also provide open space, protection against natural disasters and at the same time provide job opportunities for local residents. We looked at how an investment could be deployed to deliver multiple positive returns and serve communities in both the good times and the bad times. In fact, in 2014, I wrote a book that sought to better explain the added returns that resilience planning, projects, and practices offered, entitled: The Resilience Dividend.

You may read more about Resilience Dividend here.

Email this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedIn
The views and opinions expressed through the MAHB Website are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the MAHB. The MAHB aims to share a range of perspectives and welcomes the discussions that they prompt.
  • Greeley Miklashek

    More humans on the planet means more humans exposed to natural disasters, like the recent wild fires in CA, or super hurricanes like Katrina, etc. Resilience is a lovely concept and must make neo-liberal elites feel all warm inside at their galas, but the real cause which they never address is human overpopulation and its inevitable environmental consequences: global warming, super storms and droughts, ecological disasters and famine, 69,000,000 homeless migrants worldwide (UN), profound pollution of air, water, and food, etc. Any focus at this critical turning point in the life of Gaia other than human overpopulation and its inevitable negative environmental consequences is just BS. And as that famous late great American philosopher, George Carlin, often said: “It’s BS folks. It’s all BS, and it’s bad for ya'”. Stress R Us