The End of Politics

Julian Cribb | January 13, 2022 | Leave a Comment Download as PDF

The original article was published at Surviving C21 on January 4, 2022

Paralysis. Atrophy. Inertia. Perplexity. These terms describe the state of mind of governments around the world, grappling with an existential crisis they do not understand and whose course they appear impotent to change.

None of the usual levers work, push them, pull them how you will. You can’t halt wildfires by printing money, settle Covid with tax breaks, subsidize the sea to stop it rising, or battle global overheating with armies. The whole political juggernaut, lovingly hammered, screwed, and bolted together by politicians and economists over nearly two centuries is at last seen for what it is: a fantastic, rust-bucket contraption of whistles and wheels that no longer works, if indeed it ever did.

The science has been in for some time. Modern industrial civilization is headed for collapse under the onset of ten catastrophic threats [1] which, singly, severally, and collectively, traditional national politics now seems powerless to resolve. It doesn’t help that the world has recently chosen many political leaders – both ‘democratic’ and autocratic – without the intelligence, learning, or ability to understand what is happening. But don’t they look good on TV?

Search where you will, the picture is similar. Governments are grappling with phenomena beyond their limited experience or expertise and failing dismally. The trust which the public once reposed in politics and leaders has evaporated in the face of their patent inability to cope and in the sewerfall of lies and half-truths, they now feel compelled to gush forth to disguise their inadequacy.

Of course, there are exceptions. New Zealand, Bhutan, most of the Scandinavian countries, Germany perhaps, are doing their best. But, in the face of an overwhelming existential emergency which most other nations are seeking to make worse, it is never going to be enough. Certainly, individual countries alone are not capable of overcoming any of the catastrophic threats. These are global threats, requiring global action.

Politics, the charming theatre that has held the world enthralled for over a century and a half, is collapsing like a pricked balloon. The Earth won’t be saved by communism, capitalism, deism, socialism, liberalism, monarchism, or any other ‘ism’. There is no longer any point to political ideology. All it can do is distract us with frivolous argument from the main task of trying to save ourselves. The more ‘politics’ we engage in, the lower our chances of survival. Unfortunately, for many, it is their chief sport and entertainment. They adore the lunge and riposte of politics, no matter how pointless they now appear. They will sacrifice their children for mere spectacle.

Let us apply a simple test to human governance, to establish how fit it is for the 21st Century. How many countries have either a constitution or a policy committing them to human survival? Answer: none. Most, apparently, don’t even know it is at stake. The data telling them that civilization is in peril has been available for up to fifty years, but like good little politicians, they have managed to bury the facts under a fantasy of never-ending growth, wealth, and ‘happiness’.

Now that is all coming unraveled. In the face of ten catastrophic threats, arriving together, politics is a mere charade, offering no solutions. You cannot negotiate with physics, horse trade with chemistry, or filibuster biology – and these are the forces now shaping the human destiny. 

Unfortunately, with the marvelous exception of Angela Merkel, most recent political leaders have no education whatever in these disciplines. Where the existential emergency is concerned, they are little better than beached mullet, thrashing around without insight or direction. 

Politics is one of the four great mass delusions (the others are money, religion, and the human narrative). It is a thing that people constantly put their faith in, all objective evidence to the contrary. It is meat and drink to a media that prizes entertainment more than it does information. And, if political differences are one of the triggers for a nuclear war or a climate stalemate, then it can destroy the human species a good deal more effectively than any pandemic.

Another reason that politics, at least of the national variety, is finished is that it is running out of money. Once upon a time, governments controlled or oversaw most of the wealth within their borders. Now, much that wealth has been seized by global corporations – and governments no longer have it to dispense to grateful voters or citizens. Their only recourse is to lie to those who elect or appoint them, as they no longer have the funds to keep their promises. Intent on short-term profit, the corporations do little or nothing for human survival. Economic globalization has sandbagged world systems of governance while hardly anybody noticed.

To take a single example: the flood of 200+ billion tonnes of chemicals emitted by human activity is killing over 12 million people a year and crippling 600 million more – twice as many victims as World War II. [2] 

But are governments trying seriously to stop it? No, partly because they do not understand it and partly because they are hand-in-glove with the polluters – and what the latter do satisfies governments’ political ends. It is a clear case of politics failing to serve the interest of humanity while it continues to serve the interests of the killers. The situation is similar with climate and extinction, although there is more lip-service by politicians about the need to do something.

So, if ‘politics’, as defined by the C19th and C20th, is broken, is there any fixing it? Not while definitions irrelevant to human survival, like ‘left’ and ‘right’, remain in the ascendant. And not while political economics promises illusory wealth while it quietly devours the habitability of the planet.

However, for the first time in the history of our species, humans are having an Earth-wide conversation about these matters – sharing knowledge, experience, wisdom, and solutions to the mounting threats we face. The internet has over 5 billion participants (out of the 8 billion world population). By 2030, everyone will be online. This is the first (and last) chance we have ever had to think together as a species. To earn our self-lauding title ‘sapiens’. [3]

The slow collapse of industrial civilization is already underway and is accelerating. It is written in an increasingly savage climate, a toxic world, in raging pandemics (there have been 6 since 2000, in case you didn’t notice), in the obliteration of nature and its ability to sustain life, in the rising scarcity of essentials like water, soil, forests, and fish. Politics, absorbed in its own theatre, treats these matters as side issues compared to the trivia which is its daily fare. By the time it awakens it will be far too late to fix any of them and, anyway, today’s ‘politicians’ will not know how. Human survival is not even on their agenda.

Hope, if it still exists, resides in the increasing outreach of individuals and groups around the Planet to one another, seeking to come together and collaborate to address the existential emergency. It resides in female leadership, not male. [4] It lies in the universal sharing of wisdom and cooperation (as distinct from competition and conflict) across the whole of humanity.

In politics lies only the hemorrhage of precious time and opportunity to save ourselves. 

[1] Extinction and eco-collapse, resource scarcity, global overheating, weapons of mass destruction, pandemic disease, food insecurity, global poisoning, overpopulation, uncontrolled  technologies, mass delusion.  




Julian Cribb AM FRAS FTSE is an Australian science writer and author of five books on the existential crisis.

The MAHB Blog is a venture of the Millennium Alliance for Humanity and the Biosphere. Questions should be directed to

Add Your Heading Text Here

The views and opinions expressed through the MAHB Website are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the MAHB. The MAHB aims to share a range of perspectives and welcomes the discussions that they prompt.