Item Link: Access the Resource
Date of Publication: April 2018
Year of Publication: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier
Author(s): Michael P. Hall, Neil A. Lewis Jr., Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Journal: Journal of Environmental Psychology
Volume: 56
Pages: 55-62
Are people who are highly concerned about climate change more likely to take individual-level pro-environmental behaviors than those who are skeptical? How do they compare in terms of support for policy solutions?
The authors share findings from a study of 600 American adults and consider what the gap between belief and personal behavior means for theory and practice.
ABSTRACT: We conducted a one-year longitudinal study in which 600 American adults regularly reported their climate change beliefs, pro-environmental behavior, and other climate-change related measures. Using latent class analyses, we uncovered three clusters of Americans with distinct climate belief trajectories: (1) the “Skeptical,” who believed least in climate change; (2) the “Cautiously Worried,” who had moderate beliefs in climate change; and (3) the “Highly Concerned,” who had the strongest beliefs and concern about climate change. Cluster membership predicted different outcomes: the “Highly Concerned” were most supportive of government climate policies, but least likely to report individual-level actions, whereas the “Skeptical” opposed policy solutions but were most likely to report engaging in individual-level pro-environmental behaviors. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Access the article.
The views and opinions expressed through the MAHB Website are those of the contributing authors and do not necessarily reflect an official position of the MAHB. The MAHB aims to share a range of perspectives and welcomes the discussions that they prompt.