Universal resilience patterns in complex networks

The importance of considering systems as a whole along with the role of resilience are gaining traction across disciplines. Which raises the question: In the context of complex networks, how can we even begin to measure resiliency?

ABSTRACT: Resilience, a system’s ability to adjust its activity to retain its basic functionality when errors, failures and environmental changes occur, is a defining property of many complex systems ^[1]. Despite widespread consequences for human health ^[2], the economy ^[3] and the environment ^[4], events leading to loss of resilience—from cascading failures in technological systems ^[5] to mass extinctions in ecological networks ^[6]—are rarely predictable and are often irreversible. These limitations are rooted in a theoretical gap: the current analytical framework of resilience is designed to treat low-dimensional models with a few interacting components ^[7], and is unsuitable for multi-dimensional systems consisting of a large number of components that interact through a complex network. Here we bridge this theoretical gap by developing a set of analytical tools with which to identify the natural control and state parameters of a multi-dimensional complex system, helping us derive effective one-dimensional dynamics that accurately predict the system’s resilience. The proposed analytical framework allows us systematically to separate the roles of the system’s dynamics and topology, collapsing the behaviour of different networks onto a single universal resilience function. The analytical results unveil the network characteristics that can enhance or diminish resilience, offering ways to prevent the collapse of ecological, biological or economic systems, and guiding the design of technological systems resilient to both internal failures and environmental changes.